Leider kann Ihr Browser nicht alle Designelemente dieser Seite korrekt darstellen. Damit Sie trotzdem die kompletten Inhalte sehen können, bieten wir Ihnen diese abgerüstete Version an. Um das korrekte Design der Seite zu sehen, probieren Sie bitte einen anderen Browser.



Getting Started
If you are familiar with JUnit and want to know what JUnitDoclet can do for you, read this. (This file is part of every distribution.)

Testing without Excuses
The authors of the tool wrote an article introducing JUnitDoclet. It is available in English.(PDF, example)

Where to get JUnitDoclet? How to install? What are the requirements? This file is part of every distribution and gives some answers . If you want to read it before downloading, just click here.

Project History
It's nice to see the path a project has gone. If you want to find out about the story of JUnitDoclet, here it is.

drucken top


Known Bugs

aka "missing features" ;-)

If you encounter an error within JUnitDoclet, please see if it's already known. If it's not on the list below, please send a detailed description (maybe with some source code) to junitdoclet@objectfab.de. Thanks for helping us to improve this tool.

version 1.6

  • none (that we know of)

version 1.0.2

  • none (that we know of)

version 1.0.1

  • Lower case class names -> upper case TestCase.
  • Merging of similar method names may fail.
  • Use of filesets in ANT was difficult.

version 1.0

  • Non usual accessor methods cause trouble if
    • they have a different signature (please see below for the expected signature)
    • they are called just "get" or "set" (without any further char).
    (We didn't have tests for both situations, because we never thought of them. ;-)
    If your accessor methods look similar to the code below, JUnitDoclet is working as expected. Fortunately there are many users with the same understanding of accessor methods.
      public void setAttribute(TypeOfAttribute nameOfAttribute);
      public TypeOfAttribute getAttribute();

version 0.9.2

  • none (that we know of)

version 0.9.1

  • It is still not (yet) supported, to store tests in a subpackage "test".

version 0.9

  • It is not (yet) supported, to store tests in a subpackage "test".
drucken top